Quality and Quantity of Mentoring Received

Measure Overview

Mentoring received, quality, quantity, and key components.

Measure Information

N/A

  • Mentees (students or faculty)

STU-10

A list of all key citations from the C-Change group can be found here

Pololi, L. H., Krupat, E., Civian, J. T., Ash, A. S., & Brennan, R. T.. Why are a quarter of faculty considering leaving academic medicine? A study of their perceptions of institutional culture and intentions to leave at 26 representative U.S. medical schools. (2012). Academic Medicine 87(7), 859-869. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182582b18

Pololi LH, Evans AT, Civian JT, Vasiliou V, Gibbs BK, Coplit LD, Gillum LH, Brennan RT. Mentoring faculty: A U.S. national survey of its adequacy and linkage to culture in academic health centers. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2015;35:176-184. doi: 10.1002/chp.21294

Pololi L, Evans A, Civian J, Gibbs B, Gillum L, Brennan R. A novel measure of “good” mentoring: Testing its reliability and validity in four academic health centers. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2016;36(4):263-268. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000114

N/A

Please be aware that because the scales and the individual items are copyright (c) of C-Change at Brandeis University they cannot be reproduced in verbatim form in publications either in main text or appendices both in hard copy and/or on-line. For more information on the measure, its use, and how to access it, please see: https://cchangebrandeis.org/what-we-do/c-change-surveys/c-change-faculty-survey/

Note: NRMN CC and teams used this measure under the title: “Frequency of Mentorship 4”